In both the play and the film, the jurors simply stare at Juror 3 out of amazement of his ignorance to the facts. One similarity is how the jurors reacted to Juror 3s resistance to the chance of the boy being innocent. After analyzing all of these similarities and differences between the play and the film, the reader or viewer can conclude that the similarities and differences just help them understand the story better.
The ending scene is portrayed completely differently in the film. He stares hard at Juror 8 and then says, not guilty. Juror 3 is constantly yelling and shouting, trying to make a point. More essays like this: There are many similarities between the two versions. The differences and similarities between the stage directions and the directors shot selection in the film and in the text affect the readers interpretation of the final scene where Juror 3 says not guilty greatly.
The movie gives the reader a better chance of understanding the story and why Juror 3 caved in and chose not guilty. Another difference is when Juror 3 is yelling at the others and angrily asking them how they can believe that the boy is innocent.
This scene 12 angry men critical essays a completely different Juror 3. It shows a Juror 3 that is more kind and forgiving. This similarity helps add to the question to why Juror 3 is so bent on getting the boy convicted. He also mentions how he worked his life out into his son, but for what?
It shows Juror 3 still weak from crying and slowly gathering his belongings.
He also says that he is entitled to his opinion. The similarities brought out many good details in the story and the characters. The final similarity being discussed will be about how Juror 3s tone of voice affected the readers inference of his character. In the movie Juror 3 just keeps saying not guilty without a valid reason until he talks about his son.
In the play, all Reginald Rose wrote was that Juror 3 began to pound on the desk and seemed about to cry.
The reader can conclude from this scene that Juror 3 is trying to forgive his son for punching him and that Juror 3 is trying to move on. Slowly all of the Jurors accept the boy as innocent except for one very stubborn juror: He quietly goes out the door, leaving his sons torn picture on the desk.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. In the play there is no way to see the extent of the anger of the jurors because the play can only account for movements and tone of voice.
Juror 8 does the same in the film. The same is in the movie. There are also many differences between the text and film. He seems concerned that the other Jurors might think he is a stubborn man who only said not guilty because he was pressured into doing it. He also thinks his opinion is more important than the others because he only stressed his opinion and not the others.
One may also think that Juror 3 got tired of the case and just wanted to leave. In the play, the playwright says that Juror 8 asks Juror 3 of his arguments calmly and quietly.
In the play the playwrights directions for Juror 3 are mostly loudly or shouting. His facial expressions express lots of anger towards the boy and the jurors.
The final difference discussed will be about the things Juror 3 did before saying not guilty to the guard.The movie 12 Angry Men depicts the story about 12 people serving as jury who have completely different attitudes, personalities, emotions an.
Critical thinking played a key role in Twelve Angry Men. In order to be able to think outside the box, one must possess the ability to think unbiaslly, not bring personal issues into play, not be scared to put the ideas and doubts on the table, and to be level headed.
12 Angry Men Critical Analysis Essay Sample. In Twelve Angry Men, a boy is convicted of the murder of his father and 12 jurors are chosen to decide his fate.
12 Angry Men essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose. Home Essays 12 Angry Men - Critical 12 Angry Men - Critical Thinkers.
Topics: Critical thinking, X Writing Assignment 3 Angie Vargas “12 Angry Men” In 12 Angry Men directed by Reginal Rose, a jury determines the guilt or innocence of a young man who is accused of murder. The jury room is very intense, they have little. Free 12 angry men papers, essays, and research papers.Download