It would not be unreasonable for Pakistan to have concluded by that it had achieved the nuclear deterrence it had set out to establish in All things considered, coverage by the print and electronic media was by and large satisfactory. Except for one irresponsible editorial in an Indian party paper, there were no analogous pronouncements in this country.
The number of infiltrators, including those providing logistical backup, has been put at approximately 5, at the height of the conflict.
Neither the Northern Army Command nor HQ 15 Corps nor the lower field formations had media cells which could cater to the Kargil war summary of the press corps.
The possibility of adopting an integrated manpower policy for the Armed Forces, para-military forces and the Central Police Forces merits examination.
Despite its best efforts, Pakistan was unable to link its Kargil caper with a nuclear flashpoint, though some foreign observers believe it was a near thing. Structural reforms could bring about a much closer and more constructive interaction between the Civil Government and the Services. Information on training of additional militants with a view to infiltrating them across the LOC was not sector-specific.
While arrangements were made for official briefings at Delhi, there were inadequate arrangements at the Corps, Division and Brigade levels.
Pakistan has since fortified it with reinforced bunkers. The manpower integration proposed would also ensure compatibility of equipment and render it easier for the Army and the other forces to operate side by side effectively when required to do so.
Pakistani political and military leaders have repeatedly highlighted their nuclear capability and their will to use it. The conflict led to heightened tensions between the two nations and increased defense spending on the part of India.
He too -was in constant touch with his Command and HQ 15 Corps and had already set in motion various precautionary measures.
In its expedition and execution, the Kargil operation was "tactically brilliant". Intrusions across the LOC are not uncommon.
To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. Future-oriented long term planning suffers. There were many bits and pieces of information about activities within the FCNA region.
A number of former Army Chiefs of Staff and Director Generals of Military Operations were near unanimous in their opinion that a military intrusion on the scale attempted was totally unsustainable because of the lack of supportive infrastructure and was militarily irrational.
The Indian Armysupported by the air forceattacked the Pakistani positions and, with international diplomatic support, eventually forced a Pakistani withdrawal across the Line of Control LoC. While taking note of recent steps to entrust the NSCS with some of these responsibilities the Committee recommends a thorough examination of the working of the intelligence system with a view to remedying these deficiencies.
Likewise, steps should be taken to issue ID Cards to border villagers in certain vulnerable areas on a priority basis, pending its extension to other or all parts of the State. India also released taped phone conversations between the Army Chief and a senior Pakistani general where the latter is recorded saying: Indian news media level their first charge, despite official Indian equivocation and obscurantism, against the Pakistani Army on May 29, India 10 things you should know about the Kargil War Kargil War Kargil Vijay Divas is observed in honour of the men who lost their lives in the war.
The record needs to be set right, not through strident propaganda, but by a cold marshalling of the facts regarding contemporary events and past history. Adequate attention has not been paid to lightening the load on infantry soldiers deployed at high altitudes.
Some argue that Nawaz Sharif could not have been so duplicitous and therefore tend to absolve him and lay all blame on General Musharraf. The Committee therefore recommends the publication of a White Paper on the Indian nuclear weapons programme.
The station was under Srinagar but reported to Leh which was not focussed on Kargil but elsewhere. The Memorial also has a museum with documents, recordings and pictures of the Indian soldiers at Kargil. The Committee invited reliable information from the public pertaining to events leading up to the Pakistani aggression in Kargil through a press note in the national dailies and the regional media.
However, the progressive data of Indian casualties from May to July obtained by the Committee does not entirely support this hypothesis. National Security Management and Apex Decision-Making India is perhaps the only major democracy where the Armed Forces Headquarters are outside the apex governmental structure.
Government sets condition for talks with Pakistan 26 July Kargil conflict officially comes to an end.
The political-military distrust, as a result of the subversive concealment of the operation from the polity by military intelligence, also prevented any coherent strategy Kargil war summary either troop withdrawal or conflict resolution. This existentialist divergence between the two necessitates diplomatic interaction, continuous political analysis, Track diplomacy and intelligence collection, collation and assessment.The Kargil conflict was fought between India and Pakistan that took place between May and July in the Kargil district of Kashmir and.
The Kargil War, also known as the Kargil conflict, was an armed conflict between India and Pakistan that took place between April and June in Kashmir. The cause of the war was the infiltration of Pakistani soldiers and Kashmiri militants into positions on the Indian side of the Line of Control.
Kargil War also called as the Kargil conflict was an armed conflict between Indian and Pakistani forces that took place between May and July in the Kargil district of Kashmir and along the Line of Control. In India. Project Report (Project: Kargil War, ) Introduction The Kargil War of was a conflict between India and Pakistan on the dispute of the Kargil district of the state of Kashmir near the Line of Control.
The Kargil Conflict (Kargil War) was an armed conflict between India and Pakistan that took place between May and July in the Kargil district of Indian Occupied Kashmir and elsewhere along the Line of Control (LOC). The conflict is also referred to as “Operation Koh-e-Paima”.
Apr 13, · Pakistani forays into Kargil in late and the discovery of vacant posts on the Indian side of the LoC permitted the war to become tactically viable.Download