Life should mean life but far too often the prisoners are released after a much shorter sentence and can be regarded as a great risk to society.
In a regional context, opposing Reintroduce death penalty essay death penalty for some crimes but not for others, for some criminals but not our own citizens, opens Australia to charges of hypocrisy and undermines our commitment to the universal abolition of the death penalty.
As a matter of practicality terrorists may perceive the prospect of the death penalty as an invitation to martyrdom. The first way is by Mutual Assistance. The second way is by agency to agency assistance.
This is because, in accordance with the Australia Federal Reintroduce death penalty essay AFP Practical Guide on International Police to Police Assistance in Death Penalty Charge Situations, the AFP can assist foreign countries on a police-to police basis where no charges have been laid, regardless of whether or not the requesting country is investigating offences that attract the death penalty.
There are two key ways in which Australia can provide a foreign country with information about a criminal investigation or prosecution. It is hoped that the punishment will discourage the person from repeating the crime and also prevent others from committing that crime.
While the ICCPR recognises the right to life as a fundamental and non-derogable right, international human rights law does not require countries that retain the death penalty to abolish it, although it severely restricts its use. Some even commit suicide, as they cannot live with the consequences of their actions.
As a matter of principle, opposition to the death penalty is not about the fact that the actions of criminals disrespect the sanctity to life, it is about the State respecting the sanctity of life.
The question is, having set ourselves upon a path to a higher civilisation, are we prepared to go the distance? Those who violate this right must pay the ultimate penalty. Terrorism is a heinous crime and I understand why many people believe convicted terrorists deserve to die. In a region where many of our nearest neighbours maintain the mandatory death penalty for a wide range of offences it is inevitable that occasionally Australians will find themselves on death row.
Ultimately, I believe, the most compelling argument against the death penalty is simply that we should respect the sanctity of human life. Under agency to agency assistance - which includes police to police assistance - Australian law enforcement agencies can share information about criminal investigations with their overseas counterparts.
There are many convincing arguments against the death penalty. There have been many debates and protests about the death penalty for years and two views dominate this debate. I am concerned that section 8 1A and 8 1B of the Mutual Assistance Act do not take a strong enough stance to prevent a person being exposed to the death penalty as a result of assistance provided by Australia.
Also the Juries are less likely to convict if the death penalty is enforced. This raises the issue of how Australia should respond to a request for assistance in criminal investigations and prosecutions when providing assistance may expose a person to the risk of the death penalty.
And while one would like to think that 40 years after the hanging of Ronald Ryan, and well over a decade since Australia ratified the Second Option Protocol of the ICCPR, there would no longer be significant support for the death penalty, there are concerning signs that public support for the death penalty is growing.
Thus, they may not remove, either by deportation or extradition, individuals from their jurisdiction if it may be reasonably anticipated that they will be sentenced to death, without ensuring that the death sentence will not be carried out. Are we prepared to oppose the death penalty wherever and whenever it occurs?
Mutual Assistance is a more formal process whereby Governments can ask other Governments for assistance in criminal investigation and prosecutions.
On the one hand the criminal must be given the punishment they deserve which may be death but on the other hand under no circumstances is it possible to justify the use of the death penalty.
Opposition to the death penalty attracts bi-partisan political support. I would reintroduce the death penalty but the Justice Department must be one hundred percent certain that they have the right person for that crime.
The aims of the punishment are to find a way to deal with criminals and at the same time protect society and the individual. The belief that we should respect the inherent dignity and value of human life is the foundation of all human rights and reflects a deeply held moral vision of the type of world we want to live in.
And, in rare circumstances, Australians may find themselves facing the death penalty in a foreign country as a result of the actions of Australia.
In an era where law enforcement requires international cooperation Australian commitment to the universal abolition of the death penalty should be uncompromising - not vary from case-to-case depending on the crime, citizenship and country.
Agency to Agency Assistance Currently, the commitment to the abolition of the death penalty reflected in section 8 1A and, to a lesser extent, section 8 1B of the Mutual Assistance Act is undermined by the approach to police to police assistance in investigations which may result in the death penalty.
The rationale that the death penalty acts as a deterrent has been discredited and dismissed. For countries that have abolished the death penalty, there is an obligation not to expose a person to the real risk of its application.As a signatory to the 2nd Optional Protocol Australia can not reintroduce the death penalty and must ensure that no one within Australia's jurisdiction is executed.9 Crucially, the United Nations Human Rights Committee has held that 'countries that have abolished the death penalty, [have] an obligation not to expose a person to the real risk of.
Capital punishment or the death penalty as it is also known refers to the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. We will write a custom essay sample on Australia Should Not Reintroduce Capital Punishment specifically for you for We will write a custom essay sample on Australia Should Not Reintroduce Capital.
Reintroduce death penalty Capital punishment Death penalty is a legal process through which, as a punishment a person is sentenced to death for a criminal offense by the state Criminal offenses punishable through death penalty are referred to as capital offenses or capital crimes.
The death penalty proponents, pro-capital punishment argues that it is an important aspect for deterring crimes. Death penalty is a legal process through which, as a punishment a person is sentenced to death for a criminal offense by the state. Criminal offenses punishable through death penalty are referred to as capital offenses or capital crimes.
today, therefore if we were to reintroduce Capital Punishment we could Capital Punishment Death Penalty Essays] Research Papers words ( pages) Should the Death Penalty be Reintroduced in South Africa?
Essay - The biggest issue facing the reintroduction of the death penalty into South Africa is a simple issue of morality. Most argue. Should capital punishment be reintroduced in the UK. Print Reference this From the ’s to the ’s many capital crimes were reduced from the death penalty to imprisonment (see below table) and murder was the only ‘capital crime’ still punishable by death.
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to.Download