At some point, a balance needs to be struck where the reader has the information they require to really understand the point being made within the section. It will affect the mark that you obtain on your overall dissertation. These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters.
You can refer the reader back to it and add a few sentences if you think these are necessary. The findings chapter is essentially the describe part. Looking at pages and pages of text without any breaks can be daunting and overwhelming for a reader.
Name these, but also explain how these factors can be improved in future research. Such a model would result in the formation of small subnetworks of highly correlated neurons, partially overlapping in space.
You can refer back to the rationale that you gave for your research in the literature review, and discuss what your own research has added in this context. Despite the heterogeneous organization with regard to signal correlation, Writing dissertation discussion section tended to have similar noise correlation during on-going and tone-driven activities, suggesting that noise correlations reflect structure in the local network see below.
Here you will have to continually go back to past research and state where yours fits into it. Secondly, you must include any particularly interesting findings that have cropped up as you completed your research.
Then say what you should have done and what you will do in the future to ensure that you get other results. If you began by making a long and unstructured list of content, you can now feed that into the developing structure by inserting it as bullet points under the relevant headings.
List the main chapter headings in the order in which they will appear. Although our data seems to best fit the overlapping subnetworks model, it is only one interpretation of our results. The literature review, or context of the study The purpose of this chapter is to show that you are aware of where your own piece of research fits into the overall context of research in your field.
If you are using quantitative data, be careful about how many statistical tests you run. In this case, highlighting these themes in your findings chapter may be the most appropriate way to proceed. In addition to the research context, there may be other relevant contexts to present for example: Be honest about the limitations of your study.
Although this concern has not been thoroughly ruled out, it seems unlikely because, in at least one study, GABAergic interneuorns were loaded just as efficiently as neighboring pyramidal neurons using similar methodology If you have used multiple different instruments to collect data e. Aim to be modest but realistic in relating your own research to the broader context.
Nature Neuroscience, 13,DOI: Well, your findings chapter is sort of like a really lame movie script. This is why the analysis chapter is usually weighted quite heavily on the marking rubric. Moving from doing the research to writing a comprehensive account of it is not necessarily easy.
Instead they might jump from one thought to another and might go off topic here and there. As a result, you need to be able to make smart decisions about what to include and what to leave out. Quantitative data poses the risk of overwhelming the reader with numbers, statistics, and percentages that can make heads spin with confusion.
It is indicated whether expectations were justified. Got any tips on the discussion chapter?
Making conclusions that cannot be made from their data — you need to be able to differentiate between strong and weak results do not exaggerate your findings.
This means that any figures or graphs that you create must be readable in a black and white or greyscale format. If you need help in this area, make sure to seek it out before beginning to put your findings down on paper.
The findings are really a series of observations which can be backed up with evidence. Ensure that you are demonstrating links between multiple instruments, if you used them.about what you will write in the discussion section from the moment that the study is conceived.
Questions that you Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC is affiliated with the Department of will develop in the discussion should be considered from How to Write an Effective Discussion. The discussion section of your dissertation is the one which is the real “nitty-gritty” the culmination of all your research work should be outlined in this section.
It is here that you interpret your data and this means that you will have to refer the reader back to the tables in your results or findings [ ].
Writing the Discussion The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's.
The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis. The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. Not everyone writes a chapter called “discussion”, but everyone has to do discussiony bits because, well – that’s where the creative magic of the PhD happens.
Sep 09, · Writing a conclusion and discussion for your dissertation. Date published September 9, by Bas Swaen. but integrate an explanation of it into the rest of the section’s discussion.
Write the discussion, just as the dissertation conclusion, primarily in the present tense/5(). The discussion section of your dissertation is one of the most important parts of a dissertation, and it's worth the most marks.
As a consequence, you'll have to spend the most time on this bit.Download